News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Home births under threat 

Home births under threat

28 Oct, 2011 03:00 AM
Maitland women choosing to give birth at home will be forced to deliver their babies under a cloud of secrecy if government legislation is not changed.

It became illegal in July 2010 for a registered midwife to attend a home birth after a Senate committee recommended that all home birth midwives be insured.

Since then the number of private midwives attending births has dwindled from 200 in 2009 to just 90 in 2011.

Homebirth Australia is now calling on the federal government to ensure Australian women can continue to access the care of a registered midwife at home and not be abandoned by the government for their choice of maternity care.

Ashtonfield woman Lucy Smith, 27, gave birth to son Xavier at home in February 2010 under the care of the Belmont Birthing Centre.

She was adamant she did not want to give birth in hospital.

“I always knew I wanted to have a home birth and I really didn’t want to do it any other way,” Ms Smith said.

“The government really has no right in taking this choice away from women because this is our decision to make.

“If I had to choose between giving birth in hospital and delivering at home without a midwife then I would do it alone.”

Homebirth Australia spokesperson Michelle Meares said reforms to the maternity care system have meant many women will no longer have access to midwives.

“But many will still choose to birth at home,” Ms Meares said.“In the last two years, the impact of the maternity reforms has lead to a deterioration in options for women, greater risk for women and babies and a move from quality primary care to expensive secondary care.

“Australian women who make the safe legitimate choice to birth at home are asking – will I have to hide to give birth.”

This latest campaign coincides with Homebirth Awareness Week. Figures show home birth has increased by 14.9 per cent in Australia.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I know that this is JUST the maitland Mercury... but I think that it is still important to get your facts straight... your article is in-accurate and mis-leading at best.

I just want to point out some issues...

1. It did not become illegal in July 2010 for a registered midwife to attend a home birth. It has been widely publicised that at this time, and since then the Health Minister and her cronies have given excemption to Private Midwives to practice homebirth attendence without insurance. Therefore they are not doing anything illegal.

2, Homebirth Australia (Con't in next comment)

Posted by Pioneer_mama, 28/10/2011 5:06:55 PM, on Maitland Mercury
2. Homebirth Australia in conjunction with the Homebirth Consortium are calling on the Australian College of Midwives (ACM), AHPRA, AMA and the Australian Goverment to allow women who have recently been classed as "High Risk" and excluded from accessing midwifery care for homebirth purposes, to be able to access these services without fear of repercussions on the midwife who attends the woman.


Posted by Pioneer_mama, 28/10/2011 5:10:42 PM, on Maitland Mercury
The reason for this is that the ACM recently put out a guideline for private practicing midwives which attempted to re-write the scope of practice of a midwife. Actions like this are dangerous to women

At least the writer of this article got that part right! Heres the question though - where will these reforms stop? Will they stop once the bar is raised so high that "Low Risk" is any woman that can guarantee that nothing will happen in her birth (ie; No one) or once Midwives have their scope of practice re-written to exclude anything other than acting as a nanny and cleaner?

Posted by Pioneer_mama, 28/10/2011 5:12:40 PM, on Maitland Mercury
My partner and I faced this situation this year. We've had the wonderful fortune to experience two homebirths already, so when we became pregnant with our 5th child, we wanted another homebirth given the others were such beautiful experiences.

Unfortunately due to the abovementioned legislation, there are no insured independent Midwives in our area, and because we live in Cessnock we were unable to access the homebirth service from Belmont or John Hunter Hospital.

We chose to have an unnassisted birth over

going to hospital, where one is at risk of interruptions and interventions.

Posted by Karen, 30/10/2011 8:38:08 PM, on Maitland Mercury

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




Maitland Mercury







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...