News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 Huntlee project heads back to court 

Huntlee project heads back to court

03 Aug, 2011 04:00 AM
The controversial $1.5 billion Huntlee New Town development is headed back to court.

And this time battle lines have been drawn in the community.

Only days after the Sweetwater Action Group (SWAG) celebrated its second Land and Environment Court win with a barbecue at the weekend, LWP Property Group announced yesterday it had lodged an appeal against the ruling to quash the rezoning of the site near Branxton.

LWP Property Group managing director Danny Murphy, said the appeal was based on strong legal advice.

And support for the project has been bolstered by the formation of the Friends of Huntlee group and an online petition at www.gopetition.com/petitions/frie nds-of-huntlee.html

Friends of Huntlee spokesman Mick Starkey welcomed news of the appeal.

“It means the development is not dead in the water, which would have been a big loss to the area,” he said.

“This is a benchmark development and for the Hunter to miss out on that would be terrible.

“Looking into the future, it’s going to make the area so much more prosperous.”

The development represented the first new town in the Hunter for almost 50 years, to provide up to 7500 homes, 3000 permanent jobs and 200 hectares of employment lands over 20 years.

“We remain committed to this important regional project and we have been encouraged by the wave of support from the local community in the wake of the disappointing ruling,” Mr Murphy said.

“We have sought urgent discussions with the NSW Planning and Infrastructure Minister, Brad Hazzard, given the implications of last month’s Land and Environment Court decision for Huntlee and the broader development industry in NSW.”

SWAG spokesperson and Cessnock Greens councillor Chris Parker said the group would “vigorously defend” the appeal.

“We are not about to go away now,” he said.

“Even though the law and the court rules do not allow us to challenge the merits of this development and just why it is so bad, we have still been able to get two Land and Environment Court judgements declaring, firstly, that it was biased, and secondly that it had not been assessed thoroughly enough.”

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Is there going to be any infrastructure in the Huntlee development like Hospital, Ambulance service, doctors, medical facilities and Police.

Maitland Hospital is overcrowded now to the point of casualty overflow and lack of beds in surgical, medical and maternity wards.

Posted by jimbob, 3/08/2011 8:12:11 AM, on Maitland Mercury
As a nearby resident, I really dont have too many issues with the development, people have to live somewhere dont they ?

What I would like to see though, is a thoughful development. I keep thinking of Canberra, with its parks, cycleways and walkways. There is on opportunity here to build a wonderful place to live in, not just jam as many houses as they can on as many blocks as they can.

There needs to be good access to public areas and shops that are not just roads..

Is there a way the government can ensure the developer creates a liviable town ? I dotn think so and thats a shame!

Posted by Joey , 4/08/2011 7:48:17 AM, on Maitland Mercury
Agree with jimbob. This city is expanding beyond the present capabilities of services and facilities. When approving development both state and local government need to ensure that adequate facilities are available, planned or being constructed. This city is heaving with the lack of facilities, particularly medical, hospital, police etc.
Posted by escapee from the rat race, 4/08/2011 1:33:15 PM, on Maitland Mercury

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles




Maitland Mercury







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...