It may have illustrated the argument for the value of technological advances that most of the 350 who attended this year’s Mai-Wel Celebrity Debate on Saturday night drove their cars to Maitland Town Hall and continually checked their mobile phones for messages.
But try telling that to the affirmative team.
Comedian and television personality Tahir led the campaign that technology was indeed killing us, presenting a metaphorical argument that television, mobile phones and the internet were eroding human interaction.
He was assisted by former Knights player and administrator Mark Sargent and ABC radio presenter Aaron Kearney.
Steve Abbott - aka the Sandman - teamed up with media personality Carlee Potter and American comedian Eddie Ifft to convince the distinguished audience at the fourth annual debate of the opposite.
MC Maynard had the arduous title as the “man in charge”.
“Gone are the days of families sitting down together,” Tahir lamented. “Technology has killed so much of our society. TV has taken valuable family time away.”
Even a parents’ authority had been affected.
Rather than simply a place to sleep, children’s bedrooms have become a virtual playground fitted out with televisions, DVD players, Gameboys, Xboxes and iPod docks.
So: “What sort of punishment is it when a parent says go to your room?” Tahir said.
“Technology puts pressure on us: so many pin numbers, pass words.
“We’ve got a man named Gates selling Windows, and computers that let you make more mistakes ever in human history - except for hand-guns and Tequila.”
In his opening speech for the negative, Mr Abbott said technology was progress, illustrating his point by explaining that 25 years ago, an iPod was a “self-centred dolphin”.
“Technology is a manifestation of our intelligence,” he said.
“Technology prolongs life, it doesn’t shorten it. Technology is change, change is progress, progress is life.
“Bert Newton actually died 10 years ago, but technology keeps him alive.”
And the sledging didn’t end there: no politician, sports star or heiress was safe as the teams slammed home their cases.
For the affirmative, Mark Sargent told the audience that technology meant footy fans were forced to watch Phil Gould on high definition television: “Not only is technology killing us, it’s torture.”
Aaron Kearney opened his speech with lamenting the affect technology had on Shane Warne’s career.
“Warney could have been remembered as the best spin bowler in history; instead, his legacy was killed by technology in one single sms: ‘Hey beautiful, I’m just talking to my kids, the back door’s open’,” he said.
Even adjudicator and Newcastle City councillor Helen O’Neill wasn’t exempt.
Mr Kearney told the audience she had travelled to the hallowed chambers of Maitland City Council to experience what it was like to make a decision.
The comment did not blur her judgement of the affirmative team: Ms O’Neill named it the official winner of the contest.
But the audience preferred the negative’s case, further illustrated by Ms Potter that the internet and digital photography allowed those who were “less-than-perfect” an opportunity to present the best version of themselves and increase their chances of pro-creation.
“Humans use technology to prosper,” she said.