Local heritage conservationist Chris Richards said a decision to demolish an old Maitland home to make way for four units has broken a long-standing precedent for council.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
Maitland councillors voted last night to demolish No. 83 Church Street, Maitland, a move Mr Richards said will have developers rubbing their hands in glee.
Mr Richards told Fairfax Media earlier this week that in the past, when buildings in Maitland’s heritage zones have been recommended for demolition, they are run down properties substantially modified over the years. “This time it’s different,” he said. “This property is original, in good restorable order and in a conservation zone.”
Councillors argued on Tuesday night whether or not to defer an officer’s recommendation for the property’s demolition and construction of units.
Cr Robert Aitchison moved an amendment to defer making a decision, pending a fresh design for the proposed units.
“There are too many boxes unticked,” Cr Aitchison said.
He said he could see aesthetic issues in regards to the new unit design.
“I’m not against development but is this the best design,” he asked.
“This is something that is setting us up for the future if we get this wrong.
“It should be deferred for two weeks to see if we can get a design more fitting to the entry of the city.”
Cr Ken Wethered agreed with Cr Aitchison’s concerned about aesthetics describing the proposed unit design as “just a box.”
Cr Arch Humphery who moved the officer’s recommendation for demolition and unit construction, said some councillors were questioning the integrity of council officers who had done their homework and worked at length with the proponent to get it right.
“What are we going to do, just leave the house there and let it fall down for the sake of someone saying it has heritage value,” Cr Humphery said.
”